HEPS ENERGY
Development / The path to the field

Make the next test
the decisive one.

Our objective is a full-scale, instrumented program. Each component advances through engineering, performance and commercial gates.

Discuss a development partnership ↗
HEPS / Integrated design visionHEPS turbine concept render · background removed for presentation
HEPS turbine concept render · background removed for presentationOriginal ↗
Preferred test platform500 kWto2 MW

An existing turbine with operating history.
Host in place or compare relocation.

A development platform.
Not a completed HEPS installation.

Buy the right platform.
Measure the real difference.

A used or retiring turbine can provide a practical comparison. Condition, remaining life, modification rights, historical records and total ready-to-test cost govern the selection.

We will establish a fresh, instrumented baseline before modifications. Independent measurement must account for inflow, controls, availability and auxiliary consumption.

Internal weights and a rotating tower require distinct blade, structural and foundation acceptance. They are not assumed to fit an original turbine unchanged.

Advance by evidence.
Release by milestone.

01

Define & scope

Inventory prototypes and data. Name engineering leadership. Select the host configuration and price the independent test scopes.

02

Establish & compare

Inspect and instrument the asset. Accept the baseline, then run controlled component comparisons.

03

Demonstrate & qualify

Measure net electricity, loads, reliability and installed economics. Expand to a matched cohort when the evidence supports it.

04

Integrate & scale

Combine accepted components. Assess coupled behavior. Build a separately funded case for the next architecture.

Partner with HEPS

Know the industry?
Help shape the program.

Development moves faster with the right asset, the right test team and an accountable route to adoption.

Email HEPS ↗
01

Wind owners & operators

Asset access, operating history and a commercially relevant pilot.

02

Engineering & test teams

Independent aerodynamic, electrical and structural evidence.

03

OEMs & service partners

Manufacturing, qualification, installation and long-term support.

04

Investors & development sponsors

Milestone financing and expertise in bringing industrial technology to market.

One test platform.
Several ways to build.

Start with a compatible turbine family.
Expand through qualified partners.

01 / Retrofit

Owner-led field pilots

Compare candidate blade fins and generator modules against a measured baseline. A successful first trial creates the basis for a paid, matched-fleet pilot.

02 / Components

OEM co-development

Work with blade and drivetrain specialists on manufacturing, structural acceptance and platform-specific integration. Development and licensing are distinct milestones.

03 / Architecture

Integrated demonstration

Progress weight-equipped blades and the rotating tower through their own engineering scopes. Combine accepted components in a separately funded system program.

04 / Demand

Corporate development sponsors

Data-center and manufacturing buyers can help define demand for additional wind generation. Procurement terms and the delivery model follow measured performance.

The investment approach

A defined first milestone.
The full destination in view.

We are preparing a quote-based budget across testing, host access, fabrication, integration and operating runway. Conversations may focus on a component opportunity or the full-scale program.

The longer-term 100 MW+ architecture remains a research ambition. Larger-platform decisions follow their own resource, structural and economic studies.

Discuss the next development milestone →
Before the first conversation

The questions
that matter.

Are HEPS retrofits available to purchase now?

The technologies are in development. HEPS is seeking engineering, test-host and financing partners for defined validation programs before repeatable commercial deployment.

Can the test turbine remain at its existing site?

Yes. Hosting in place is a preferred option where condition, access, modification rights, data and permissions support it. Relocation will be compared on total ready-to-test cost.

Will every technology fit an existing turbine?

Compatibility is assessed separately. The internal weight system needs a suitable blade structure, and whole-tower rotation needs its own support and foundation design. The first host does not imply all components can be installed unchanged.

What will success be measured against?

A fresh operating baseline, net electrical output including auxiliary loads, structural behavior, reliability, installation cost and owner economics. Historical records inform the program but do not replace controlled comparisons.

What is the 100 MW+ concept?

It is a longer-term research ambition for a larger integrated architecture. It is not a demonstrated capacity or the rating of the proposed first 500 kW–2 MW test platform.

Evidence and validation

What historical prototype testing establishes

Historical HEPS testing reported higher peak torque in a small prototype comparison. Peak torque and instantaneous speed readings do not establish sustained net electrical output. A complete energy balance must include weight actuation, auxiliary consumption, losses and structural loads.

Read the original prototype report (Google sign-in may be required), or examine the assumptions and reported readings in the illustrative comparison lab. Independent full-scale testing remains part of the development program.

The next phase / Join the work

Bring your expertise.
Build the next step.

Wind asset owners. Engineering and test teams.
Industrial investors. Development partners.

Start a conversation ↗

Open original file ↗